<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: unconfirmed rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rob.orangejack.com/2007/02/28/unconfirmed-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2007/02/28/unconfirmed-rumor/</link>
	<description>an inconsistent reminder that random is a constant</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2007/02/28/unconfirmed-rumor/#comment-74691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2007/02/28/unconfirmed-rumor/#comment-74691</guid>
		<description>I think it's hilarious. It just shows how we as a society have lost the ability to distinguish fact from fiction. Isn't "unconfirmed" rumor, redundant? That's what a rumor is; unconfirmed information?

Unless of course, an "unconfirmed rumor" is information that might be a rumor, but we haven't confirmed that yet. In which case, a "confirmed rumor" is a story that is definitely "unconfirmed."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s hilarious. It just shows how we as a society have lost the ability to distinguish fact from fiction. Isn&#8217;t &#8220;unconfirmed&#8221; rumor, redundant? That&#8217;s what a rumor is; unconfirmed information?</p>
<p>Unless of course, an &#8220;unconfirmed rumor&#8221; is information that might be a rumor, but we haven&#8217;t confirmed that yet. In which case, a &#8220;confirmed rumor&#8221; is a story that is definitely &#8220;unconfirmed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
