<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Device Updates on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>an inconsistent reminder that random is a constant</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Calming the Twitter Noise &#124; rob's place</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-76114</link>
		<dc:creator>Calming the Twitter Noise &#124; rob's place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-76114</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back I discovered a great way to manage the noise on Twitter by using Device Updates on Twitter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while back I discovered a great way to manage the noise on Twitter by using Device Updates on Twitter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75837</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75837</guid>
		<description>Interesting, because in a way, you've created your own private little news portal. Neat idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, because in a way, you&#8217;ve created your own private little news portal. Neat idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75829</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75829</guid>
		<description>@Kevin : how are you being notified of those tweets?

@Ryan : yeah, I like your rule of 2x followers.  I usually check that too.  When I find out someone is following me, I check to see if they have a bio, website, and follower/following ratio.  Then I decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin : how are you being notified of those tweets?</p>
<p>@Ryan : yeah, I like your rule of 2x followers.  I usually check that too.  When I find out someone is following me, I check to see if they have a bio, website, and follower/following ratio.  Then I decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Price</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75826</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob,

I prefer to read ALL my tweets through the IM client, so I actually find the process of clicking "Follow" and then "Notifications ON" to be tedious if I want to follow the 5 new people who seem to find me every day.

I also have a rule, though. I don't follow people if they're following 2x more people than are following them.

If it's something like "Following 2500, 1250 Followers", then I'm pretty sure most of those 1250 are fellow spammers or bots, and I don't think I can get anything out of it.

I still watch my @replies and if one of those people addresses me directly, then I follow them.

That should be a post - twit-iquette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob,</p>
<p>I prefer to read ALL my tweets through the IM client, so I actually find the process of clicking &#8220;Follow&#8221; and then &#8220;Notifications ON&#8221; to be tedious if I want to follow the 5 new people who seem to find me every day.</p>
<p>I also have a rule, though. I don&#8217;t follow people if they&#8217;re following 2x more people than are following them.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s something like &#8220;Following 2500, 1250 Followers&#8221;, then I&#8217;m pretty sure most of those 1250 are fellow spammers or bots, and I don&#8217;t think I can get anything out of it.</p>
<p>I still watch my @replies and if one of those people addresses me directly, then I follow them.</p>
<p>That should be a post - twit-iquette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Donahue</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Donahue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/03/31/device-updates-on-twitter/#comment-75825</guid>
		<description>One of the things that has been a great breakthrough for me was to modify my @ reply settings. Instead of hearing one side of a lot of conversations, I now only cue in to @ replies between two people I am following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that has been a great breakthrough for me was to modify my @ reply settings. Instead of hearing one side of a lot of conversations, I now only cue in to @ replies between two people I am following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
