<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calming the Twitter Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/</link>
	<description>an inconsistent reminder that random is a constant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-76120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/?p=2605#comment-76120</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. I suppose I ignore most of the noise on Facebook myself. Maybe if the majority of my social network used Twitter I&#039;d be there, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. I suppose I ignore most of the noise on Facebook myself. Maybe if the majority of my social network used Twitter I&#8217;d be there, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-76117</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/?p=2605#comment-76117</guid>
		<description>&quot;Isn&#039;t noise the whole point of Twitter?&quot;

@Jerry - Not at all.  In fact, that highlights a gross misunderstanding of what Twitter is about.  It&#039;s not about creating or monitoring noise.  It&#039;s about connecting quickly with others and turning those into conversations and sharing.  

My point in this post is that when you follow a lot of people (because you want to be connected at some level), there can be a lot of information flowing.  But there is some information from some sources I don&#039;t want to miss.

The Facebook &#039;noise&#039; I&#039;ve found to be just as loud though a bit easier to manage.  However, saying that one should read Facebook instead of Twitter for less noise is to ignore a potentially completely different audience.

The noise level for either is dependent on how often the people you&#039;re connected with contribute to the noise.

But of course neither is noise if it contributes.  And I&#039;ve found Twitter to have more contribution than Facebook.  But I use both to connect.  This shouldn&#039;t be a Twitter vs Facebook conversation anyway.  They are completely different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t noise the whole point of Twitter?&#8221;</p>
<p>@Jerry &#8211; Not at all.  In fact, that highlights a gross misunderstanding of what Twitter is about.  It&#8217;s not about creating or monitoring noise.  It&#8217;s about connecting quickly with others and turning those into conversations and sharing.  </p>
<p>My point in this post is that when you follow a lot of people (because you want to be connected at some level), there can be a lot of information flowing.  But there is some information from some sources I don&#8217;t want to miss.</p>
<p>The Facebook &#8216;noise&#8217; I&#8217;ve found to be just as loud though a bit easier to manage.  However, saying that one should read Facebook instead of Twitter for less noise is to ignore a potentially completely different audience.</p>
<p>The noise level for either is dependent on how often the people you&#8217;re connected with contribute to the noise.</p>
<p>But of course neither is noise if it contributes.  And I&#8217;ve found Twitter to have more contribution than Facebook.  But I use both to connect.  This shouldn&#8217;t be a Twitter vs Facebook conversation anyway.  They are completely different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-76116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/?p=2605#comment-76116</guid>
		<description>Wow. I would put an application that controls Twitter noise in the same category as a Diet Coke alongside a Big Mac. Isn&#039;t noise the whole point of Twitter? Or rather, why would you want all that noise if your desire is the small amounts of valuable information? Read Facebook instead. Signal to noise ratio for Twitter is just too high for me to start with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I would put an application that controls Twitter noise in the same category as a Diet Coke alongside a Big Mac. Isn&#8217;t noise the whole point of Twitter? Or rather, why would you want all that noise if your desire is the small amounts of valuable information? Read Facebook instead. Signal to noise ratio for Twitter is just too high for me to start with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim F.</title>
		<link>http://rob.orangejack.com/2008/07/28/calming-the-twitter-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-76115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rob.orangejack.com/?p=2605#comment-76115</guid>
		<description>For some reason, I&#039;ve always had trouble getting pretty much any RSS feed from Twitter to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, I&#8217;ve always had trouble getting pretty much any RSS feed from Twitter to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
